Journal Basic Info

  • Impact Factor: 2.709**
  • H-Index: 11 
  • ISSN: 2474-1663
  • DOI: 10.25107/2474-1663
**Impact Factor calculated based on Google Scholar Citations. Please contact us for any more details.

Major Scope

  •  Endoscopy Methods
  •  Ovarian Cancer
  •  Blood Cancer
  •  Cervical Cancer
  •  Lung Cancers
  •  Radiation Therapy
  •  Breast Cancer
  •  Gynecological Cancers

Abstract

Citation: Clin Oncol. 2021;6(1):1808.DOI: 10.25107/2474-1663.1808

Dosimetric Comparison of IMRT, Hybrid IMRT and Hybrid VMAT for Early Stage Right-Sided Breast Cancer

Suyan Bi, Rui Zhu, Xingru Sun, Qi Zeng and Zhitao Dai

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, China
Department of Oncology, Yunyang County People’s Hospital, China

*Correspondance to: Zhitao Dai 

 PDF  Full Text Research Article | Open Access

Abstract:

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and hybrid Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for early-stage breast cancer, including plan quality and Second Cancer Risk (SCR).
Methods: Three different plans were designed in full IMRT, hybrid IMRT, and hybrid VMAT for each of eight patients with early-stage breast cancer. Target quality, Organs at Risk (OARs) sparing, and SCR were compared among the three plans.
Results: Compared with the hybrid IMRT, full IMRT showed deterioration in terms of D2% of Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB), V10 of ipsilateral lung, and Excess Absolute Risk (EAR) to contralateral lung and esophagus. The Homogeneity Index (HI) of SIB, V5 of ipsilateral lung and combined lung, the Dmax and Dmean of the esophagus, the EAR to contralateral breast and lung, and
the EAR to the esophagus with hybrid VMAT dramatically increased by 12.5%, 19.49%, 18.87%, 90.59%, 167.69%, 50.14%, 264.68%, and 160.95%, respectively (p=0.022; 0.040; 0.044; 0.041; 0.003; 0.020; 0.000; 0.003). The EAR to contralateral breast and contralateral lung by full IMRT was significantly decreased compared with the hybrid VMAT (26.97%, p=0.033; 50.01%, p=0.026). Conclusion: The results confirmed that hybrid IMRT could achieve better target quality and OARs sparing than full IMRT and hybrid VMAT for early-stage right breast cancer. Hybrid IMRT was the best treatment option, while hybrid VMAT performed the worst among the three plans in terms of SCR to peripheral OARs.

Keywords:

Dosimetric; Second cancer risk; IMRT; Hybrid IMRT; Hybrid VMAT

Cite the Article:

Bi S, Zhu R, Sun X, Zeng Q, Dai Z. Dosimetric Comparison of IMRT, Hybrid IMRT and Hybrid VMAT for Early Stage Right-Sided Breast Cancer. Clin Oncol. 2021;6:1808..

Search Our Journal

Journal Indexed In

Articles in PubMed

NMR Metabolomics in Ionizing Radiation
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
Metastatic Retroperitoneal Paraganglioma: Case Report and Review of the Literature
 PubMed  PMC  PDF  Full Text
View More...

Articles with Grants

Erlotinib Treatment Beyond Progression in EGFR Mutant Patients Who Have Responded to EGFR TKIs in Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC: An Open Label Randomized Trial
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
Transanal vs. Laparoscopic Transabdominal Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer: Comparison of the Operative and Functional Outcomes
 Abstract  PDF  Full Text
View More...